Prediction of Pam Shriver vs Betsy Nagelsen Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
P. Shriver vs B. Nagelsen

Pam Shriver

USA

9

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

1.83m

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Right-handed

Plays

Betsy Nagelsen

USA

9

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

1.83m

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Right-handed

Plays

Head-to-head: Shriver 9 - 0 Nagelsen

They have played 21 sets in total, with Pam Shriver winning 19 and Betsy Nagelsen winning 2. The last match between Pam Shriver and Betsy Nagelsen was at the Philadelphia, 09-11-1992, Round: R3, Surface: Carpet, with Pam Shriver getting the victory 6-1 6-4.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Shriver	9
Nagelsen	0

Last 10 H2H Matches:

(R3) Philadelphia(11-09-92)

Stats

Pam Shriver

Betsy Nagelsen

(SF) Brisbane(12-29-86)

Stats

Pam Shriver

Betsy Nagelsen

(R1) Unknown Tournament(06-23-86)

Stats

Betsy Nagelsen

Pam Shriver

P. Shriver vs B. Nagelsen H2H Profile

P. Shriver	Stats	B. Nagelsen
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
69.49% (665-292)	Career Total W/L	48.97% (356-371)
6	Grass	0
1	Hard	0
2	Indoor	0
0	Titles	2
9	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

P. Shriver vs B. Nagelsen Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Pam Shriver has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Betsy Nagelsen has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Pam Shriver, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Betsy Nagelsen has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Pam Shriver has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Betsy Nagelsen has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Pam Shriver has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Betsy Nagelsen winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Pam Shriver has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 80% (W/L 160/40), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 16/11). Betsy Nagelsen has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 80% (W/L 89/59), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 45% (W/L 90/108).
Player level: In the last year, Pam Shriver has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Betsy Nagelsen has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 10 times before with Pam Shriver winning 9 times and Betsy Nagelsen being victorious 1 times. They have played 21 sets in total, with Pam Shriver winning 19 and Betsy Nagelsen winning 2.
The last match between Pam Shriver and Betsy Nagelsen was at the Philadelphia, 09-11-1992, Round: R3, Surface: Carpet, with Pam Shriver getting the victory 6-1 6-4.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Pam Shriver has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Betsy Nagelsen has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Pam Shriver has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Betsy Nagelsen has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Pam Shriver has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Betsy Nagelsen has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Pam Shriver vs Betsy Nagelsen Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

P. Shriver vs B. Nagelsen H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

P. Shriver	Stats	B. Nagelsen
9	H2H Matches Won	1
19	Sets Won	2
123	Games Won	60
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
90% (9/10)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	10% (1/10)
0% (0/1)	Deciding Set Win %	100% (1/1)
90% (9/10)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
10% (1/10)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	10% (1/10)

Recent Performance Stats

P. Shriver Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
IGA Tennis Classic - Oklahoma City, Oklahoma - 17-02-1997
QF Lisa RaymondL. Raymond	L	7-5 7-6(1)	Stats
R2 Rene CollinsR. Collins	W	6-4 6-3	Stats
R1 Patricia Hy-BoulaisP. Hy-Boulais	W	7-5 6-7(4) 6-3	Stats
Oakland - 04-11-1996
R3 Rennae StubbsR. Stubbs	W	6-2 6-7 6-3	Stats
R4 Linda WildL. Wild	L	6-3 6-0	Stats

View All

B. Nagelsen Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Indian Wells - 21-02-1994
R3 Natalia ZverevaN. Zvereva	L	6-0 6-1	Stats
Budapest - 18-10-1993
Q1 Asa CarlssonA. Carlsson	L	6-1 6-4	Stats
Montpellier - 11-10-1993
R3 Natalia BaudoneN. Baudone	L	6-0 6-4	Stats
Unknown Tournament - 21-06-1993
Q2 Sophie AmiachS. Amiach	L	7-6 6-4	Stats
Q1 Alison SmithA. Smith	W	6-3 6-2	Stats

View All

P. Shriver vs B. Nagelsen Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

P. Shriver	Stats	B. Nagelsen
69.49% (665/292)	YTD Win/Loss	48.97% (356/371)
67.69% (1427/681)	Sets Win/Loss	49.59% (850/864)
57.47% (11077/8197)	Games Win/Loss	49.70% (7950/8046)
66.98% (142/70)	Hard Win/Loss	45.45% (90/108)
59.26% (16/11)	Clay Win/Loss	46.81% (44/50)
66.18% (225/115)	Indoor Hard W/L	39.53% (51/78)
80.00% (160/40)	Grass Win/Loss	60.14% (89/59)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
265.91	Average Opponent Rank	0
63.33% (19/11)	Slam W/L	53.33% (8/7)
91.67% (11/1)	Cups W/L	0% (0/0)
66.67% (2/1)	Main Tour W/L	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	Challenger W/L	80.77% (21/5)
67.68% (111/53)	Futures W/L	37.74% (40/66)
70% (657/937)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	49% (348/712)
50% (1/2)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	100% (3/3)
55% (12/22)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	56% (5/9)
50% (111/220)	Deciding Set Win %	47% (128/273)
92% (647/595)	1st Set Won, Won Match	81% (348/281)
8% (647/52)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	19% (348/67)
21% (299/64)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	19% (373/72)